OCULAR DOMINANCE AND REFRACTIVE ASYMMETRY
Abstract
Background: Refractive errors are considered a public health problem in many countries as well as by the WHO. This study compares refractive errors in dominant eye and non dominant eye. As dominant eye is most associated with high degree of refractive error.
Objective: This study conducted to find out degree of refractive error in dominant and type of refractive error in dominant eye. The main purpose of this study is to find out association of ocular dominance with refractive asymmetry. Â
Patients and Methods: Before the start of research a pre-research planning was done. It included selection of research site, target population, sample size, study designs of survey Performa. During data collection tested visual acuity and performs subjective refraction. The study was conducted in the month of October and November 2015. It was an institutional based study, conducted on 100 patients (including patient of every age) having refractive errors. This study includes individuals with no associated ocular pathology, having mild to moderate amount of refractive error. Distance (6m) a visual acuity was measured by using Snellen visual acuity chart and subjective verification done. Dominant eye was found out by Dolman method and refractive error of dominant was noted. Results were by filling a structured Performa.
Results: After analyzing the data it is suggested that majority of patients have right eye dominancy. 56% were with right dominancy and 44% were with left dominancy. Dominant eye was with more myopic in myopic patients and less hyperopic in hyperopic patients.
Conclusion: All results concluded there is greater prevalence of right eye dominancy and dominant eye have greater degree of myopia in myopic patients and less hyperopia in dominant eye in hyperopic patients.Full Text:
PDFReferences
Lopes-Ferreira D, Neves H, Queiros A, Faria-Ribeiro M, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Gonz, et al. Ocular Dominance and Visual Function Testing. BioMed research international. 2013;2013:7.
Momeni-Moghaddam H, McAlinden C, Azimi A, Sobhani M, Skiadaresi E. Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(3):509-14.
Handa T, Shimizu K, Mukuno K, Kawamorita T, Uozato H. Effects of ocular dominance on binocular summation after monocular reading adds. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2005;31(8):1588-92.
Seijas O, Gomez de Liano P, Gomez de Liano R, Roberts CJ, Piedrahita E, Diaz E. Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision. American journal of ophthalmology. 2007;144(2):209-16.
Van Strien JW, Lagers-Van Haselen GC, Van Hagen JM, De Coo IF, Frens MA, Van Der Geest JN. Increased prevalences of left-handedness and left-eye sighting dominance in individuals with Williams-Beuren syndrome. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology. 2005;27(8):967-76.
Aygul R, Dane S, Ulvi H. Handedness, eyedness, and crossed hand-eye dominance in male and female patients with migraine with and without aura: a pilot study. Perceptual and motor skills. 2005;100(3 Pt 2):1137-42.
Eser I, Durrie DS, Schwendeman F, Stahl JE. Association between ocular dominance and refraction. Journal of refractive surgery. 2008;24(7):685-9.
Dalton K, Guillon M, Naroo SA. Ocular Dominance and Handedness in Golf Putting. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2015;92(10):968-75.
Pekel G, Acer S, Ozbakis F, Yagci R, Sayin N. Macular asymmetry analysis in sighting ocular dominance. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2014;30(10):531-6.
Barrett BT, Bradley A, Candy TR. The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia. Progress in retinal and eye research. 2013;36:120-58.
shneor E H. Effects of eye dominance in visual perception. International Congress Series. sep 2005;1282:719_23.
Cho K-J, Kim S-Y, Yang S-W. The refractive errors of dominant and non-dominant eyes. Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society. 2009;50(2):275-9.
Dane Ş, Gümüştekin K, Yazici AT, Baykal O. Correlation between hand preference and intraocular pressure from right-and left-eyes in right-and left-handers. Vision research. 2003;43(4):405-8.
Handa T, Mukuno K, Uozato H, Niida T, Shoji N, Shimizu K. Effects of dominant and nondominant eyes in binocular rivalry. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2004;81(5):377-83.
Handa T, Uozato H, Higa R, Nitta M, Kawamorita T, Ishikawa H, et al. Quantitative measurement of ocular dominance using binocular rivalry induced by retinometers. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2006;32(5):831-6.
Nitta M, Shimizu K, Niida T. [The influence of ocular dominance on monovision--the interaction between binocular visual functions and the state of dominant eye's correction]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi. 2007;111(6):435-40.
Yang HK, Hwang JM. Decreased accommodative response in the nondominant eye of patients with intermittent exotropia. American journal of ophthalmology. 2011;151(1):71-6 e1.
Pekel G, Alagoz N, Pekel E, Alagoz C, Yilmaz OF. Effects of ocular dominance on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged people. ISRN ophthalmology. 2014;2014:903084.
Domenech B, Mas D, Illueca C. Influence of ocular dominance in the variability of the eye’s anterior segment measurements. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 2010;121(24):2221-3.
Koctekin B, Gundogan NU, Altintas AG, Yazici AC. Relation of eye dominancy with color vision discrimination performance ability in normal subjects. International journal of ophthalmology. 2013;6(5):733-8.